Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 7:21 pm
” In the underlying action, a hybrid FLSA collective action and state-law wage and hour class action, the district court had granted certification under both Federal Rule 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 8:34 am
Harvey Randall, New York State Civil Service law scholar and author of NY Public Personnel Law https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/ mentioned that the “three looks and you’re out” is a New York City specific rule and I thank him for that correction. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
And now we’re sharing the results with Lawfare readers so that you can have a better understanding of what may come if and when an electoral controversy arises. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:14 pm
And Judge Gould persuaded me that this is actually precisely the sort of case in which certification is appropriate.Here's the paragraph that convinced me that Judge Gould was entirely right and I (or at least my first reaction) was wrong:"When "there is no relevant precedent from the state's highest court, but . . . there is relevant precedent from the state's intermediate appellate court," we "must follow the state intermediate… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
See In re Wells Fargo Home Mortg. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am
Thus, the question of knowledge logically precedes the question of reliance. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:58 am
The case, In re Facebook, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
But Canada, noting that 34 U.S. states have rejected Illinois Brick for their state antitrust laws, declined to adopt the Illinois Brick doctrine, and ruled that consumers should be able to sue for manufacturers’ overcharges passed on to them. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Additionally, if you remain outside of the U.S. for a period of one year or longer, Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) does have the authority to question you and may take your Green Card, as they consider trips of 1 year or longer without a re-entry permit, abandonment of Lawful Permanent Residence in the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:09 am
On December 19, 2014, then-President Obama signed the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act into law. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:47 pm
Among the many issues that arise is the extent to which varying state laws can impact whether questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
In order to have a class certified, the plaintiffs have the burden of proving to the satisfaction of the court, “after a rigorous analysis,” that they comply with Rule 23—that is, that “there are in fact sufficiently numerous parties, common questions of law or fact, etc. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:12 am
A handful of states have state specific certification. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
Delaware, a state often considered an incorporation “mecca” with its favorable tax laws, preeminent business court and unified body of corporate law, has recently enacted a controversial statute that may call the state’s corporation-friendly reputation into question. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
Delaware, a state often considered an incorporation “mecca” with its favorable tax laws, preeminent business court and unified body of corporate law, has recently enacted a controversial statute that may call the state’s corporation-friendly reputation into question. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
Accordingly, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, id.Download PDF file of In re Vioxx Consolidated Cases [read post]
14 May 2020, 3:03 am
There have been lots of law firm memos about the PPP requirements, including several yesterday about FAQ #46. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In In re Appeal of Valente, (VT State Bd. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 9:43 am
Before Missouri can require compensatory mitigation for jurisdictional wetlands as a condition in a 401 Certification, the Corps must first determine that the wetland in question constitutes a jurisdictional wetland, or "waters of the United States," under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 10:56 am
Harvey Randall, New York State Civil Service law scholar and author of NY Public Personnel Law https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/ mentioned that the “three looks and you’re out” is a New York City specific rule and I thank him for that correction. [read post]
