Search for: "IN RE G.S."
Results 41 - 60
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
The Court of Appeals held earlier this month in In re Public Records Request to DHHS, 2022-COA-284, ___ N.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:28 am
The Facts of In re B.W.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
Now we’re really getting somewhere. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
Yep, it's four times more likely that they're correlated. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
Stay tuned to see what happens when the North Carolina General Assembly re-convenes in January. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
” In re Ann M.C. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
See In re S.R.S., 180 N.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:21 am
See G.S. 7B-302; In re S.D.A., 170 N.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:39 pm
The Nash County Health Department immediately suspended the food establishment operating permit of Doug Saul’s Bar-B-Que & Seafood, located on 813 Western Avenue in Nashville, NC on Friday, Nov. 22, pursuant to G.S. 130A-23, as there were conditions present constituting an imminent health hazard. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
G.S. 15A-535(a). [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 11:40 am
G.S. 15A-535(a). [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Juvenile’s confession was voluntary, but trial court reversibly erred in failing to consider the juvenile’s age when determining custody status for purposes of Miranda and G.S. 7B-2101 In re: J.D.F., ___ N.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
G.S. 4-1. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:29 am
G.S. 7B-2502(a2), -(a3). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Requiring much longer periods of enrollment may (re)implicate those concerns. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:36 pm
See In re Custodial L. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:38 pm
In re Custodial Law Enforcement Agency Recordings, No. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:14 pm
., G.S., and I.F., Children (Indian Child Welfare Act) In re Hotchkiss (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm
Probationers (37 percent) were less likely to be re-arrested than prisoners (49 percent). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
In re D.S., 364 N.C. 184, 193–94 (2010) (holding that noncompliance with 15-day deadline, plus 15-day extension, for filing of juvenile delinquency petition following submission of complaint did not deprive court of jurisdiction; court relies on decisions holding that a statute’s use of term “shall” for time in which to act may be directory, not mandatory). [read post]