Search for: "IN RE HAWKINS MINORS"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm
Maurice - 324Bourgogne - 344 bow - 366bracelet – 169 Braunschweig - 259breastplate - 133, 134, 333 Brickell Point - 374Bridestones – 152 Brigance - 30Brignogan – 325 Brimble – 138Brimham Rocks – 156 Brise - 349, 350Britain - 2, 11, 20, 27, 30, 31, 42, 84, 100, 113, 115, 188, 242British Isles - 4, 27-37, 107, 113, 163, 246 British Museum - 7, 330Brittany - 31, 188, 242, 324, 325, 346, 347, 348, 349Brizil – 327 Broceliande - 325Brodgar – 54 Broomend of Crichie… [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
There's a line at the end of the film when [co-star] Sally Hawkins says to me. 'You're just a child' and Nick told me he now wishes he hadn't put it in. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
" I'll put Hawkins and Silverman as "Yes" votes, even though I think they're less strident votes in this regard. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:51 am
At the plea colloquy, he admitted the elements of an illegal re-entry after deportation, 1326. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on First… [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Turner, No. 03-2608 Conviction and sentence for several Hobbs Act and firearms offenses based upon an attempt to rob an armored car facility are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) a Hobbs Act conspiracy is not a "crime of violence" for purposes of a charge for use of a weapon during a crime of violence; 2) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act; 3) the district court improperly instructed the jury on the elements of… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:47 am
There was a minor rules controversy. [read post]
