Search for: "IN RE ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., which dealt with a similar two-part test created by the Federal Circuit in Brooks Furniture dealing with reasonable attorney fees. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court overruled Federal Circuit jurisprudence and provided a flexible framework for district courts to grant attorney's fees in "exceptional cases"under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., and second, whether it was error to rule that patent laws don’t apply to a contract entered into in the U.S. for the sale of goods abroad. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., which eased the burden for imposing attorney’s fees. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:02 pm
Public health advocates want people to monitor their health, and a lot of people think fitness trackers are cool ways to do it. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 12:06 pm
Icon Health & Fitness granted district court judges broad discretion to award attorneys’ fees as they see fit in patent litigation. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:26 pm
., health information). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Category: Infringement By: Abby Lin, Contributor Case:Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 11:36 am
Icon Health and Fitness, the court made it easier for defendants that win patent cases to get their attorney’s fees paid by the patent holder. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:13 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., the Supreme Court also rejected the “rigid” two-part Brooks Furniture test, holding that “an ‘exceptional’ case [warranting attorney fees] is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position . . . or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:41 am
ICON Health & Fitness. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. broadened the “exceptional case” rubric used to determine when an award of attorney fees is appropriate in a district court patent dispute. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
Icon Health & Fitness, No. 12-1184, a patent case. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health & Fitness (SCOTUS 2014); Highmark v. [read post]
