Search for: "IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUC" Results 41 - 60 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2021, 6:59 am by Michael Geist
That continues with the response to last week’s Supreme Court of Canada decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
  “Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed,… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
  Let us track his rationale as follows: The removal penalty in Article II, though mandatory, is merely appurtenant to the powers of impeachment, trial and conviction provided the houses of Congress in Article I. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
But there is nothing explicitly mandatory in the compromise text. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
The trial court also reminded the jury that the reasonable doubt standard applied to all parts of the trial and re-instructed the jury on the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and reasonable doubt. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” In a similar vein, the United Kingdom’s Legal Education Foundation noted in 2017, Research is vital to help us understand where legal need is greatest, and prioritise resources… historically, the legal services and legal education sectors have placed little emphasis on the importance of evidence-led approaches to the design and delivery of services. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
-based federal appeals court is stepping into the legal dispute over former national security adviser Michael Flynn as it weighs whether a judge can be forced to dismiss a case the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:07 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
We wrote an op-ed sort of critiquing the Kentucky Supreme Court’s approach to the bar exam, and a sitting Kentucky Supreme Court Justice wrote a 1000 word op-ed in which he personally called us out. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
After the Supreme Court reversed the district court injunction, the federal government executed the first person since 2003. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by admin
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gilmer v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:49 am by SHG
” (The definition comports with how the Supreme Court regards sexual harassment.) [read post]
The Texas Supreme Court recently provided pointed guidance to litigants seeking attorney’s fees in a fee-shifting setting. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:55 am by Russell Knight
  If there are changes, well, at least you know what you’re agreed on and what you’re fighting about. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:14 am by RCoffield@fsblaw.com
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia granted a request from the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission for a temporary waiver of current CLE rules and regulations which limit the CLE credits for online and in-house credits to 12 credits, or half of the mandatory continuing legal education requirements. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 8:11 am by RCoffield@fsblaw.com
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia granted a request from the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission for a temporary waiver of current CLE rules and regulations which limit the CLE credits for online and in-house credits to 12 credits, or half of the mandatory continuing legal education requirements. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am by Samantha Fry, Masha Simonova
Beyond 10 days, a local health official can petition the superior court for an order authorizing continued detention for up to 30 days. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:16 am by Bob Ambrogi
Some among you might argue that we’d reached that point much earlier, others might contend we’re not yet there. [read post]