Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: L. P., J. P. AND P. P., CHILDREN (FATHER)"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
L. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 7:01 am
” So what factors do judges look at to determine children’s best interests when shaping time-sharing schedules? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The father was represented by Neal P. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:43 pm
L. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
L. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:33 am
The consolidated opinion concerned two applications for leave to appeal—In re C I Morris Minor, Case No. 142759 and In re J L Gordon Minor, Case No. 143673. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
” Comment Two further cases ML and AR v RWB and SWB (2012) Fam Law 13 and Re P and L (2011) EWHC 343 1, the judgments of which post-date this appeal, attempted to lay down some guidance when dealing with cases which concern children born to two female parents and a known male parent. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:28 pm
Ken Knabb http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/debord/8.htm ) Guy Debord, Gil J Wolman, “Mode d’emploi du détournement” in “Les Lèvres Nues #8? [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
J. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
L. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
In the interest of time and space, I haven’t discussed the municipal court candidates, but Smartvoter.org lists them. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
WAGNER, Chief of Police of the City of Hollywood, Florida, MICHAEL J. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Tapan Banerjee AIR 1986 P&H 113, Ram Sarup v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
It is unlikely that Iowa would probably accept that argument, however, based upon the decisions of the North Dakota Supreme Court in the case of In the Interest of A.B.[23] and the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[24]. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
It is unlikely that Iowa would probably accept that argument, however, based upon the decisions of the North Dakota Supreme Court in the case of In the Interest of A.B.[23] and the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[24]. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42] The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43] South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42] The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43] South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(h) "Immediate family member" shall include spouse; natural and adoptive parents, children and siblings; stepparents, stepchildren and step-siblings; fathers-in-law, mothers-in-law, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, sons-in-law and daughters-in-law; and grandparents and grandchildren. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Alberta J. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 12:09 am
Many people assume that the mother automatically receives custody of the minor children in a divorce whether she is a fit or unfit parent and the father will never receive custody of the children. [read post]
