Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF E.G., Minor Child, E.G., Minor Child, Appellant."
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
(See e.g. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges, discussed here), courts must now deal with an interesting twist. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
” Given this statutory context, assume a hypothetical set of facts, under California law, where the only persons with a claim for the wrongful death of a minor or adult child are his or her divorced parents. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
He reiterated the now familiar international materials on the rights of the child which mandate the primacy but not paramountcy of the child’s best interests and the need to avoid stigmatisation in particular. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:32 am
See, e.g., Roby, Jini L., and Melanie Vincent. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
See, e.g., § 63.042(2)(c), Fla. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
., Appellant), 2017-0433. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
*658 Nondisparagement orders often are issued as a means to protect minor children during contentious divorce or child custody proceedings in order to protect the child’s best interest. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
That leaves it as something like a record of first instance court decisions, but not appellate decisions. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
If we gauge public opinion based on reader comments on the Toronto Star website (e.g. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
" The minor was continuing to have rage issues (e.g., throwing a chair and punching another student) but these were improving. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Practical implications of the judgment The Court emphasised that tracing should only take place where it is in the child’s best interests and the child has been properly consulted about his or her wishes [69]. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
The Appellate Divison affirmed. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
And the Department of Justice itself has disavowed responsible procreation and optimal child rearing as sufficient rationales for DOMA, citing to empirical studies about child development and reports by leading medical, psychological, and social welfare organizations. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
I’ve already written here about why I have serious concerns about yet another Republican-appointed Justice; and I have little doubt that a Justice Barrett will solidify a minority-appointed and minority-confirmed Court whose jurisprudence will be deeply problematic. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Schaar for Plaintiff and Appellant. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
See, e.g., Duncan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
See, e.g., Bell, 236 F.3d at 167-68 (noting that closing the courtroom for testimony from a child victim that she was repeatedly raped and molested by her step grandfather “is indisputably appropriate under Supreme Court jurisprudence, provided the trial judge determines on a case-by-case basis that the State’s legitimate concern for the well-being of the minor victim necessitates closure. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Such alternatives are no panacea, however, especially when the agreement fails to specify valuation parameters including the standard of value (e.g., fair market value, fair value, book value) and level of value (e.g., controlling, marketable minority, nonmarketable minority). [read post]
