Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF L. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 41 - 60
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Family Court denied the petition, finding that he was equitably estopped from asserting paternity because it would not be in the child=s best interests, as the child had an established parent‑child relationship with the mother=s husband, the respondent Joseph T. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
Slip Op. 05523 (2d Dept., 2019) the parties were married in July 2006 and had two minor children, Liya L. and Emery L. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted the foster mother’s petition to be appointed kinship guardian of the child. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:25 pm
L. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
(mother or Ms. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
It held that the Family Court had the authority to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237(b) and Family Court Act § 651(b). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Recent LegislationLaws of 2021, Ch 56Laws of 2021, Ch 56, Part L § 4 to § 14 amended the Family Court Act as follows. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Section 1911(b) became applicable, with prospective application, when the child met the definition of an Indian child under ICWA. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:46 am
First, subsection 63-3-530(A)(33)(2)(b) specifically recognizes a “presumption that the parental decision is in the child’s best interest. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 5:58 am
§ 40.3(B). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:58 am
KCP&L’s claim against B&W resulted in a $3.5 million meditation settlement. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 8:13 pm
A consistently well-written blog is the Ohio Family Law Blog written by Robert L. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
., b/n/f Tricia Gracey Tominack v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act, §1055 (b)(E) was repealed. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
There does not seem to be a dominant consideration of safety, including where there is family violence, beyond the best interests of a child analysis giving primary consideration to the child’s safety (see: Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 2nd Supp, s 16(2)). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest An article by Joel R. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Family Court, denied the mother’s objections and directed the mother to pay child support of $319.32 bi-weekly. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm
Best interest: A child’s love for his mother does not prevent termination of parental rights when the child’s best interest would be served by severing his relationship with his abusive and drug-addicted parents. [read post]
