Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF T. P., A CHILD"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 5:01 pm
Thus, the conclusion seems justified that, as one state court has put it, “[t]he Act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the Indian child’s best interest that its relationship to the tribe be protected. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Officers and suspects normally aren’t lawyers. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
Pix Credit here My Administration places the highest urgency on governing the development and use of AI safely and responsibly, and is therefore advancing a coordinated, Federal Government-wide approach to doing so. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
In the order, the court considered the plaintiff’s right to privacy and the child’s interest and observed that the “dissemination of misleading information relating to a child, especially as regards her physical or mental wellbeing, is something which is completely intolerable in law” [p. 2]. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
It is only to the extent that other selves, even those created by humanity, relate to humans, that they become of interest—and most be regulated, possessed, controlled, and managed—with respect to its interaction with or use by humans. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Under s. 25(1) of the Act, the Minister has a discretion to exempt foreign nationals from the Act’s requirements if the exemption is justified by humanitarian and compassionate considerations, including the best interests of any child directly affected. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Shipman & Elizabeth P. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 4:09 pm
You can’t argue about assets that have already been gifted. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
Kamehameha School (9th Cir. 2010) ("[P]hysical harm presents the paradigmatic case for allowing anonymity. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 6:16 pm
All of these currents and problems presume the humanity as the only or the central subject of interest. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
In 2004, Chief Judge Michael P. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Oppong opined that ‘[t]here is little prospect of this happening […]. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Nothing groundbreaking, but a few interesting issues: Cox v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:17 am
Child Support Judgments. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
” (p. 13). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
By Richard T. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
McDonnell has a privacy interest in the data itself. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
(p. 59) (emphasis added) The Ninth Circuit went on to hold that Cisco meets this “knowing assistance” (p. 39) standard. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
§ 40-6-7X1(1)(f) (requiring parental consent for changes in a child's pronouns). [read post]
