Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT, ETC. "
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We begin with a short description of equity in its application n the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Sufficiency of Denials and Allegations. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Can Oceanic claim issue preclusion against Kate on the matter of the airline’s negligence? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:09 am
The claimants were keen that the matter be tried in England against both defendants. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
And, indeed, in this aspect, it is not truth or credibility that is important, it is the acceptability or praiseworthiness of the idea, fact etc. advanced, that tales center stage. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Option No. 2: Categorically prohibit the denial of same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
On Appeal from the 215th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2017-13499. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
So as not to make this post overly long, I'll assume familiarity with my post from yesterday, where I discuss some of these matters in greater detail.Is Philadelphia's Nondiscrimination Condition Generally Applicable? [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Seattle School District No. 1, etc. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
His application was denied. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
As a practical matter, of course, the industry could simply take the position that whatever the interest rate was at that time of [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:25 pm
At Issue - Matters are "at issue" when the complaining party has stated his/her claim, the other side has responded with a denial, and the matter is ready to be tried. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
As one whose practice, for decades, revolved around Supreme Court cases, court of appeals cases and trial court cases involving major antitrust matters, I do not ever remember hearing or reading of remarks like Sheehan’s being made in open court. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
In Ashok Kumar Mittal, this Court pointed out that present system of levying meagre costs in civil matters (or no costs in some matters), is wholly unsatisfactory and does not act as a deterrent to vexatious or luxury litigation borne out of ego or greed, or resorted to as a `buying-time' t [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:02 am
There is no benefit from such an appeal. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The determination of a claim of political motivation is distinct from the determination of application of the political offense exception, which will continue to be made by the U.S. judiciary, consistent with U.S. law. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It also depends on the applicability of these safeguards. [read post]
