Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT, ETC. "
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 7:10 am
China, Russia, Iran etc.) have attempted to silence dissent emanating from abroad. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:27 am
Seattle School District No. 1, etc. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
”) R.C. 2953.02 (“In a capital case in which a sentence of death is imposed for an offense committed…the judgment or final order may be appealed from the trial court directly to the supreme court as a matter of right. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
It makes the Sentencing Commission's guidelines binding on the courts, although it preserves for the judge the discretion to depart from the guideline applicable to a particular case if the judge finds an aggravating or mitigating factor present that the Commission did not adequately consider when formulating guidelines. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We begin with a short description of equity in its application n the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It also depends on the applicability of these safeguards. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It also depends on the applicability of these safeguards. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Application of the accommodation in the case of “self-insured” plans, however, may raise slightly more complicated questions.Insured plansMost employers purchase their employees’ insurance coverage from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
DuVivier, supra, 1045).Direct democracy remains popular in states that permit its exercise. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm
We can only conclude that, even though the ‘rules of criminal law are generally applicable’ to traffic violations (People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
Appeals -- Certiorari -- No basis for certiorari review regarding grant of motion for protective order as to interrogatories and order declaring plaintiff a “vexatious litigant” -- Jurisdiction -- Appeal of dismissal for failure to state a cause of action with leave for plaintiff to amend is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the dismissal is a non-final orderPATRICK NEPTUNE, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
Option No. 2: Categorically prohibit the denial of same-sex marriage. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The limit cannot be exceeded except with the approval of the SLAB, but no application can be made to exceed the limit if it does not relate to a specified distinct matter by virtue of regulations (which do not apply here). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The limit cannot be exceeded except with the approval of the SLAB, but no application can be made to exceed the limit if it does not relate to a specified distinct matter by virtue of regulations (which do not apply here). [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 7:35 pm
The newly created Article III Federal Immigration Court should conduct de novo hearings and review appeals of denials of visas, waivers and applications for extension, change or adjustment of status without any deference accorded to the agency because of its presumed expertise but decide the case solely on the facts and law. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Its refusal (pursuant to DOMA) to do so to date has caused heartbreak (deportation and visa denial of non-citizens legally married to U.S. citizens), financial hardship (denial of survivor benefits from military service, Social Security, etc.), and any number of other evils large and small for decent people trying to make lives for themselves in the increasing number of states to have embraced marriage equality. [read post]
