Search for: "INDIRECT PURCHASERS"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm
Wild Law Group PLLC (“WLG”) has been named interim lead and liaison counsel for the indirect purchaser class in In re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1952 and interim lead counsel for the indirect purchaser class in In re Dairy Farmers of America Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 2031. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
These are usually called the “indirect purchasers. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 12:20 pm
The Perrin Law Firm is liaison counsel for the indirect purchaser class. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 6:04 am
Daniel Sokol PhD student Firat Cengiz of the University of East Anglia - Centre for Competition Policy has written a paper on Passing-On Defense and Indirect Purchaser Standing in Actions for Damages Against the Violations of Competition... [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:41 am
The court held that WaMu’s losses resulting from its purchase of fraudulent loans were “direct” losses, and that WaMu’s sale and contractual obligation to repurchase the fraudulent loans did not convert its losses from direct to indirect. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 9:42 am
Perrin, for the indirect purchaser class in In re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1952. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:14 am
The court found similar problems with the indirect purchasers’ expert. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
The issue in this class action, then, is whether plaintiffs were “indirect purchasers,” or whether lessees were “direct purchasers” as held in In re Mercedes-Benz Anti-Trust Litig., 364 F.Supp.2d 468 (D.N.J. 2005). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm
Today, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs filed their motion for preliminary approval and authorization to disseminate notice of their settlement with Defendant The Home City Ice Company. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
Warner Chilcott announced in a press release today that it has reached tentative settlements with thirty-four states and the District of Columbia and indirect pharmaceutical purchasers that brought antitrust lawsuits concerning Warner Chilcott's oral contraceptive Ovcon 35. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:17 pm
Supplemental brief filed in Third Circuit en banc case challenging certification of a nationwide, state-law, indirect-purchaser antitrust class action seeking to recover monopoly overcharge damages: This afternoon, I filed this supplemental brief for appellant in the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins of the Northern District of California held that California Corporations Code sections 25400(d) and 25500 permit suits by “indirect purchasers” of pre-IPO shares, i.e. purchasers who bought securities interests from intermediaries and not from the issuer. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 2:00 pm
Supplemental reply brief filed in Third Circuit en banc case challenging certification of a nationwide, state-law, indirect-purchaser antitrust class action seeking to recover monopoly overcharge damages: Moments ago, I filed this supplemental reply brief for appellant in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
Because the plaintiffs were indirect purchases of concrete, they needed to prove both that the impact on direct purchasers and that the subsequent impact on indirect purchasers were susceptible to proof through common evidence. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
There are few aspects of U.S. antitrust law as seemingly well settled as Illinois Brick’s “indirect purchaser rule. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
Third Circuit orders supplemental briefing in case challenging a federal court's ability to certify nationwide state law indirect purchaser antitrust class actions for purposes of settlement: You can access today's quite fascinating order of the en banc U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
(I suppose we'll have to put aside, for the moment, why De Beers felt it necessary to resolve indirect purchaser claims in the states which don't recognize indirect purchaser claims.) [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 4:37 am
Within a period of 26 weeks from the purchase at this price, in June 2008, Daiichi agreed to acquire shares of Ranbaxy by way of purchase from Ranbaxy promoters and by subscription to fresh shares of Ranbaxy. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:10 am
After making the purchase, the managing member identified what it believed was a problem. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:41 am
The court held that WaMu’s losses resulting from its purchase of fraudulent loans were “direct” losses, and that WaMu’s sale and contractual obligation to repurchase the fraudulent loans did not convert its losses from direct to indirect. [read post]
