Search for: "INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 12:55 pm
If systems or software on a company’s network are vulnerable to new threats, companies should follow industry practices in updating and patching the information technology. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
When that information violates laws or regulations, Network Service Providers are required to take certain affirmative actions, including stopping the dissemination of the information, preserving the relevant records and informing the relevant government departments. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:14 pm
Wood Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:55 am
Nov. 22, 2010) (Class Action Complaint) (available here). [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
With “written consent,” a network operator can allow another entity to monitor its network and operate defensive measures on its behalf. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
The individual may also take other positive action to communicate consent, such as clicking an icon, sending an email or subscribing to a service. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:45 am
The AEPD provides the following examples of actions that could be considered a valid consent / affirmative action (where the due information has been provided to users): The use of the scroll bar, insofar as the information on cookies is visible without using it. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:17 pm
The so-called “Buzz Consent Agreement” was reached after Google released users’ personal information in violation of its own privacy policy when launching its ill-fated social network, Buzz, to compete with Facebook. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:45 am
For “basic” functions, the draft amendments allow controllers to obtain a combined consent for all “basic” functions through affirmative actions by data subjects. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:37 pm
Although it approved Imperium’s proposal, in November 2013, the FTC rejected a proposal submitted by AssertID that would have allowed the use of feedback from “friends” on social networks to verify that the person providing consent is actually the child’s parent. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:37 pm
In her dissenting statement, Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter also criticized the consent order for failing to require Zoom to take any corrective action to mitigate the harm to customers. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:17 am
Social networking giant Facebook Inc. will have to give users “clear and prominent notice” and obtain “affirmative express consent” before sharing customers’ information beyond their existing privacy settings, under a proposed administrative consent order with the Federal Trade Commission made public Nov. 29 (In re Facebook Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 6:37 am
” This enforcement action follows other recent FTC actions on similar issues, suggesting the agency ramping up consistent with the overall direction of the Biden Administration concerning cybersecurity. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:46 pm
has made a similar objection in its no-action request to exclude a written consent proposal filed by Chevedden. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
According to the complaint, the company sold information about user’s employment history to potential employers without consent. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:53 am
Just in time for Christmas, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the financial industry (including casinos and card clubs) regulator, announced its first-ever enforcement action against a card club, California’s Oaks Card Club (Oaks). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Do not assume that a referral means consent. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:26 pm
For more information, visit consumerfinance.gov. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:45 am
Action that amounts to consent – The cookie banner or pop-up must spell out as clearly and prominently as possible what specific action or conduct will amount to consent. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm
On October 8, 2014, a district court judge in Georgia dismissed with prejudice a Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) action against The Cartoon Network (CN), holding that the disclosure of the plaintiff’s Android ID was not actionable because the Android ID did not qualify as “personally identifiable information” (PII). [read post]
