Search for: "INTERNATIONAL LAND CO. v. MARSHALL" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Amicus Brief of Point Man International Ministries Amicus brief of Major General (Retired) Charles E. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Finn.Finn, John E.Chantilly, VA : Teaching Co., c2006.KF4750 .F56 2006 DVDCivil RightsKF372 .J36 2010Root and branch : Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and the struggle to end segregation / Rawn James, Jr.James, Rawn.New York, N.Y. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
Kurzban.Kurzban, Ira J.Washington, DC : American Immigration Council, c2010.ImmigrationKFP81 .P4 NO.6361Immigration law forum 2010[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2010.Intellectual PropertyKF3116 .P34 2010Patent obviousness in the wake of KSR International Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Lee, an intellectual-property litigator and co- managing partner of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, said of Desmarais. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
Gerald Neuman and Harold Koh, among others, responded to Bradley and Goldsmith (Koh had been co-counsel in numerous human rights cases, including Kadic v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Gerald Neuman and Harold Koh, among others, responded to Bradley and Goldsmith (Koh had been co-counsel in numerous human rights cases, including Kadic v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
"  That decision would remain the law of the land for nearly sixty years until overruled in the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]