Search for: "IP Acquire and Operate Ltd."
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 9:36 am
The name of the company IP Application Development Limited is interesting, because abbreviated it is IPAD Ltd. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
It announced in July that it would acquire S3 Graphics for $300 million in a bid to bolster its ammunition in patent fights. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
It announced in July that it would acquire S3 Graphics for $300 million in a bid to bolster its ammunition in patent fights. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
The IPKat prefers the real thing to the online version If you like gambling and 32 is your lucky number, or if you like betting on whether the decision of a non-specialist IP judge in a complex piece of litigation has a chance of surviving a vigorous appeal, here's a judgment that is sure to excite you: it comes from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales and it's WHG (International) Ltd., WHG Trading Ltd and William Hill Plc v 32Red Plc [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
(IP Dragon) Europe L’Oréal v eBay: a warning to online marketplace operators (JIPLP) Germany Apple v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:08 pm
Transform into a legitimate supplier with good relationships with operators in emerging markets, also because when a Shanzhai producer is acquiring a high profile it will be vulnerable for IP lawsuits (as happened to "G'Five International Ltd, a Shenzhen-based handset supplier that mainly sells phones in Asian and African countries, and was sued by Nokia in India for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
” * Realcomp II, Ltd v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Ltd. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:32 am
IPS reported, "Lethal Drug Shortage Creates Ethical Quagmire," by Matthew Cardinale. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
(Class 46) Global – Patents Patent due diligence: Strategic patents & acquired liability in M&A (Patent Due Diligence) Global – Copyright Top IP-Watch stories of 2010: Copyright fights, ACTA, Medicines access (IP Watch) Australia The fee for using music in gyms: FCAFC rules in Fitness Australia Ltd v Copyright Tribunal (ipwars) Brazil How to sell gemstones? [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:21 am
We have for example learned that small businesses find it more burdensome to acquire and litigate IP rights than to big, well-funded ones, for example, and we have found that intellectual property offices and courts run more efficiently when they are better managed and operate under more flexible rules; that specialist IP judges handle complex IP litigation with less difficulty than those who have never experienced the field before; and so on. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
The AmeriKat's firm and colleagues may have changed and she may not know what form goes with what client, but thankfully, IP has (mostly) stayed the same. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
Research in Motion, Ltd. 10-cv-113, filed 3/31/10, E.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
For this reason, DARPA developed a method of assigning words to IP addresses. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
A news flash from London-based law firm Herbert Smith brings tidings that the Court of Appeal for England and Wales has today reversed the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Butters and others v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others (noted here on IP Finance, with a short summary of the facts). [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
In the salad days of personal computing, Ben Day came up with a "touch screen form entry system" while working at AT&T. 4,763,356 resulted. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(Spicy IP) Another win for Indian IP and transparency: IPAB website updated (Spicy IP) Power of IPAB to stay the operation of a patent (Spicy IP) Another sound mark granted (Spicy IP) Compulsory licensing by the Copyright Board: Whither copyright expertise? [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 1:14 am
"It's important to have an ability to operate and continue to practice your science, and we believe we clearly have that. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:51 am
Although it was really a competition law decision, the ruling of Mr Justice Morgan in Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd and others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch), a decision from the Chancery Division, England and Wales last August (noted here by the IPKat) was deemed to be of note to IP lawyers and owners too. [read post]
