Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In the United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
Kriesel, supra(government's retention of the defendant's blood sample was `reasonable under the circumstances’ because the government needed the sample to ensure the accuracy of future DNA identifications).U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:18 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:03 pm
CompCo sells its goods globally, and some of the goods end up in the U.S., infringing on Lenovo’s patent in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:28 am
Claim 1 reads as follows:"A data communication device configured to communicate with a storage device via a network and to store image data in the storage device, the data communication device comprising: a scanner (240) configured to read an image and to input image data; an input unit (230) configured to input user identification information to allow access to the storage device; a log-in processing unit (201) configured… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005); United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
In a recent opinion, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:36 am
The standard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is similar to the standard set forth in Arthur A. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
United States, 714 F.3d 1311, 1315 (Fed. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Use of the drug took place in a military context: everyone in the decedent’s unit took an antimalarial drug before shipping to Afghanistan. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:36 pm
This is the first time an appellate court in the United States has reviewed a geofence warrant. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
’ In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data, supra. [read post]
