Search for: "Ikuta v. Ikuta"
Results 41 - 60
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 1:50 pm
Walden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 3:44 pm
He says that he thinks that the panel was wrong on the merits -- stating that "Judge Ikuta and Judge Nguyen have persuasively argued" that the panel erred -- but that these errors were fact-specific and didn't meet the en banc standards, especially in light of the facts noted above. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
” The Honorable Judges Sandra Ikuta (Majority Opinion), and William Fletcher (Dissent)United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Judge Ikuta says “this case is over. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
And let's say that, as a matter of doctrine, your a district judge who agrees with Judge Ikuta that when a case gets dismissed in the district court and the Ninth Circuit affirms, the case is over? [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 5:40 pm
Reasonable minds might disagree about whether Judge Ikuta's opinion is correct or whether Judge Christen's dissent has the better of the argument.Regardless, one can't help but leave the opinions with a firm sense that Judge Klausner entered the procedural orders he did here (e.g., denying stipulated agreements to extend a super-rapid class certification deadline) with a firm eye towards making sure that the class never got certified.Whether that's a case-specific… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:33 am
Today, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a ruling denying en banc rehearing in New York v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
When, as here, Judges Berzon and Ikuta agree that circuit precedent is probably wrong, I suspect that you'll see a successful en banc call to fix the problem.It's one of those plethora of "what counts as moral turpitude under state law" cases, which determines whether we kick someone out of the country. [read post]
27 May 2020, 12:50 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
However, eight judges joined a dissenting opinion authored by Judge Sandra Ikuta. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
1) Allen v. [read post]
