Search for: "Impact 180, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:01 am by Sean Wajert
L'Oreal USA, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 5063, 2011 WL 4089902, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., No. 15-1025 (Preclusive impact of ITC consent judgment). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm by Daniel Richardson
  The new tower would have antennae at the 180- and 100-foot levels, well above the tallest trees. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 2012-206987, 2015 WL 775094 (S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc., et al., No. 15-1025 (Preclusive impact of ITC consent judgment). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Navy: (IP Law360),Crown Packaging - Summary judgment granted to Reexam Beverage Co finding patent infringement by Crown: (Delaware IP Law),eBay - District Court held that likelihood of confusion analysis is not limited to the goods or services for which mark was registered in Applied Information Sciences v eBay: (IP Law Observer),Global Patent Holdings - GPH files another patent infringement case regarding their JPEG on a website patent: (Troll … [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Turning to proximate cause, although the required standard of proximate cause has been imprecisely and variously stated, the alleged malpractice needs to be at least a substantial factor if not the “but for” factor in a plaintiffs damages (180 E. 88th St. [read post]