Search for: "In Interest of CT" Results 41 - 60 of 8,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
A particularly interesting decision involves an injured employee whose weight gain and related physical problems resulted from post-COVID syndrome. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:22 am by Bill Marler
Infinite Herbs-brand organic basil packed in 2.5-oz clamshell packaging and sold at Trader Joe’s stores in AL, CT, D.C., DE, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, and WI. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
In pointing out the virtues of transparency, I do not intend to downplay the privacy interests of those who have experienced sexual assault. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The appraisal proceeding to determine the value of Farro’s cashed-out interest was stayed for years while the parties litigated whether Farro had the right to unwind the cash-out merger (again, here), but was ultimately filed (LMEG v Farro, 501508/2021 [Sup Ct. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
In pointing out the virtues of transparency, I do not intend to downplay the privacy interests of those who have experienced sexual assault. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
 But the interesting part of the opinion is just how relentless it is in insulting the underlying lawyer, Douglas Vanderpool.I would literally have to retype the whole thing to impart an accurate impression of just how pervasively the Court of Appeal publicly shames the underlying attorney, who also represents his firm on appeal. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:57 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Second perception which I see very interesting is that, incorrect, I have seen lawyers hardly being part of any disputes. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Historic England confirmed that they did not wish to offer any comments on the proposals [11]; the Victorian Society expressed concern that the removal of the old font would undoubtedly cause harm to the significance of the building, as it was the loss of a fixture of enormous historic interest and also eroded the C19th design and layout that intentionally incorporated the historic font [12]. [read post]