Search for: "In Interest of Jamie L" Results 41 - 60 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 6:11 am
Cline, Pepper Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 Tags: Advanced notice, Appraisal rights, Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions Are Board Members Overcommitted? [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Runnells Martin and Michelle Davis, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Monday, July 9, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL Section 220, Fiduciary duties, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder voting Are Merger Clauses Value Relevant to Target and Bidder Shareholders? [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Glynn “20 Years of Protecting Intermediaries: Legacy of ‘Zeran’ Remains a Critical Protection for Freedom of Expression Online” by Cindy Cohn and Jamie Williams “How the Supreme Court Ignored the Lesson of ‘Zeran’ and Screwed Up Copyright Law on the Internet” by Roger Allan Ford “Moral Hazard on Stilts: ‘Zeran’s’ Legacy” by Mary Anne Franks “The Possible Redundancy of §230” by Brian L. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Proposed Consent Judgment directly and substantially implicates the rights and obligations of numerous interested parties, including TSI, and the Proposed Consent Judgment contemplates conduct that would harm consumers. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Proposed Consent Judgment directly and substantially implicates the rights and obligations of numerous interested parties, including TSI, and the Proposed Consent Judgment contemplates conduct that would harm consumers. [read post]