Search for: "In Interest of Street" Results 41 - 60 of 28,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 8:27 am by Andrew Abramowitz
The Wall Street Journal with the latest on financing college expenses via equity, i.e., a share of future income. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:18 am by Christopher Hoffmann
You may lose interest if they take their time in responding to your claims. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 9:07 am by Lovechilde
  Occupy Wall Street embraces diverse multitudes but this time in the interest of convergence. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 3:04 pm
“You get interesting glimpses of them,” he says. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:30 pm
If you think you may be affected by the 96th Street Project and/or are interested in a free consultation, contact our eminent domain landowner attorneys at 1-888-318-3761 or visit us on the web at www.landownerattorneys.com. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:31 am by Brian Wolfman
At Credit Slips, Adam Levitin has posted this interesting piece on what he calls a "smear campaign" by the Wall Street Journal against Elizabeth Warren motivated by a desire to undermine the legitimacy of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. [read post]
In contrast, the Eligible Lender is prohibited from assigning or transferring its interest in the Main Street loan (and, in the case of Main Street expansion loans, its existing interest in the underlying loans as well) until the earlier of (i) the maturity date of the Main Street loan and (i) the date neither the Main Street SPV nor a governmental assignee holds an interest in the loan. [read post]
In contrast, the Eligible Lender is prohibited from assigning or transferring its interest in the Main Street loan (and, in the case of Main Street expansion loans, its existing interest in the underlying loans as well) until the earlier of (i) the maturity date of the Main Street loan and (i) the date neither the Main Street SPV nor a governmental assignee holds an interest in the loan. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has at long last adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:32 am by Thom Lambert
It’s hard to discern much that’s coherent — much less cogent — from the cacophony that is Occupy Wall Street, but one valid complaint continually sounds through the noise:  When business interests get in bed with the government, injustice tends to result. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:02 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Loans made under each of the facilities provide practically the same terms: interest rate, maturity date, one-year deferral of principal and interest, and no prepayment penalty. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm by emagraken
Interesting reasons for judgement were published today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, finding a street racer partly liable for the death of a passenger in another vehicle that he did not collide with. [read post]
Rather, they may find an old way coming back: interest bearing business checking accounts. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Kyle Krull
Small business owners may find a new way of banking, thanks to a little-known amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act . [read post]