Search for: "In Matter of Clayton"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
There’s really no acceptable method of statutory construction according to which the Clayton Act prohibits all mergers. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:17 am
Clayton Cnty., Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII extended to situations in which "an employer … intentionally treats a person worse because of sex—such as by firing the person for actions or attributes it would tolerate in an individual of another sex. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:09 pm
The true dog days, it turns out, are July 3-Aug. 11, no matter the weather. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
But so long as we avoid 5-4 conservative-liberal splits, he is happy, no matter what the opinion says. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
DHS’s AR for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 shows ICE FOIA got worse on nearly every significant metric that matters to requestors. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
Clayton, an associate in Baker Donelson’s Nashville office, is a healthcare attorney with a focus on transactions and other corporate matters. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
Bedoya is right that the word efficiency doesn’t appear in the Clayton Act, Sherman Act, Robinson-Patman Act, or any other major antitrust statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
All of these challenges have one thing in common: the FTC’s aggressive stretching of the Clayton Act’s coverage. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No Clayton Act violation. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 7:57 am
Schapiro, Mary Jo White, and Jay Clayton (Schapiro and White were appointed by Democratic presidents; Clayton was appointed by a Republican president). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:34 am
Controlling the narrative mattered enormously. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
But it doesn’t matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
It's highly unlikely, as an initial matter, that the plaintiffs could show that the Act lacks a rational basis. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Does the nature of the federal judicial power or for that matter Article III permit such sweeping relief? [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
Protestor at Black Lives Matter protest in Baton Rouge strikes a police officer. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
Clayton County. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Culligan Decision But in June 2014, the First Department issued Culligan Soft Water Co. v Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC (118 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:29 am
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v Clayton County, which held that Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination also extended to transgender and gay workers. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within the… [read post]
