Search for: "In RE: Asbestos Litigation" Results 41 - 60 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The important divide between regulatory practice and the litigation of causal claims in civil actions arises from the theoretical nature of the risk assessment enterprise. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Owens Corning, the court found the securities class action – which alleged the company misrepresented its exposure to asbestos claims in its financial reports – did not “arise out of” asbestos, but rather out of the directors misleading investors regarding the company’s projected financial performance. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Litig., 858 F.3d 787, 793 (3d Cir. 2017) (affirming exclusion of causation expert witness) Magistrini v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 11:55 am by Joe Consumer
This isn’t the end of opioid litigation or settlement talks, of course. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:57 pm by Celina Metlick
She has worked on large and complex multidistrict litigation, including hormone replacement, tobacco, asbestos, and airbag cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Marmor, eds., Product Liability Litigation: Current Law, Strategies and Best Practices (2nd ed. 2021). [8] Id. at § 8:5.1 Overview (referring to In re Silica Prods. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
A state judge and I were attempting to settle large numbers of asbestos cases. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
The gravamen of the defense’s appeal was that these expert witnesses had failed to support their opinions and that the trial judge had misapplied the established judicial gatekeeping procedures required by the New Jersey Supreme Court, in In re Accutane Litigation, 234 N.J. 340 (2018). [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am by Paul M. Hauge
Admitting their testimony on non-asbestiform, said the Appellate Division, was reversible error under the standard articulated in the New Jersey Supreme Court’s opinion in In re Accutane Litigation, which “distilled” the factors set forth in the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am by Paul M. Hauge
Admitting their testimony on non-asbestiform, said the Appellate Division, was reversible error under the standard articulated in the New Jersey Supreme Court’s opinion in In re Accutane Litigation, which “distilled” the factors set forth in the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:48 am by Paul M. Hauge
Admitting their testimony on non-asbestiform, said the Appellate Division, was reversible error under the standard articulated in the New Jersey Supreme Court’s opinion in In re Accutane Litigation, which “distilled” the factors set forth in the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:56 am by Francis Pileggi
Courtesy of the Delaware Business Court Insider, we provide our article that appeared in the April 21, 2021 edition on an important topic for Delaware litigators. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
Drukier declared, “but we’re certainly not trying to get anybody out. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Such litigation can take decades to resolve, or may even become a perpetual motion litigation machine, such as asbestos personal injury cases. [read post]