Search for: "In RE MARRIAGE OF HARMS v. Harms" Results 41 - 60 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Kelly McClure
A family member’s acts can be considered family violence if they’re intended to result in harm or a reasonable fear of imminent harm. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Kelly McClure
A family member’s acts can be considered family violence if they’re intended to result in harm or a reasonable fear of imminent harm. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:41 pm by Brad Pauley
  The Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four, held in a published decision, In re Marriage of Green, 205 Cal.App.4th 1475, that credit purchased during marriage was community property, and remanded the case to the trial court to consider allocation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:05 am by Matthew Harwood
And many of us are living the commitment at the core of marriage and are harmed when the law treats us as legal strangers. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
I am currently conducting research to determine whether coercive control can be considered psychological harm for the purpose of the future harm exception to confidentiality and solicitor-client privilege.[1] My research is supported by the OBA Fellowship in Legal Ethics and Professionalism Studies. [read post]