Search for: "In Re: Amendment of Section 9 of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Section 9(1) alone is, therefore, relevant for our purpose. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
County of Allegheny, No. 06-2869 "In an action against various defendants for violations of 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and state law, arising from a former 911 dispatcher's improper use of his job facilities to track down and kill his ex-girlfriend and her boyfriend, plaintiff's son, dismissal of the claims is reversed in part and the matter remanded with instructions to permit plaintiff an opportunity to amend certain state-created danger and equal protection claims, as… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
In re D. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
A brief summary of the discussion of some landmark judgements delivered by the Supreme Court on the subject is given below. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
On November 9, 2009, Safety Nat’l Casualty Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
On April 9, 1984, in response to a breakdown in talks between employers and dairy unions, the Conservative legislature of Saskatchewan enacting The Dairy Workers (Maintenance of Operations) Act, S.S. 1983‑84, c. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
By Michael Douglas and Mhairi Stewart Andrew Bell is a leader of private international law in Australia. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Copyright Office 512 Study, April 1, 2016: Question 9. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2019 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2019 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2020/01/articles/ceqa/2019-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are one CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2019 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2019 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2020/01/articles/ceqa/2019-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are one CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:33 am
See, e.g., FISA (including several post-9/11 amendments), the Torture statute, the Geneva conventions, the UCMJ, the War Crimes Act, the PATRIOT Act, the assault statute, the DTA, the McCain Amendment, etc.The problem is not that Congress has been silent -- the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Changes to Meet International Norms Perhaps most prominent of the changes introduced by the America Invents Act is section 3, which changed the law from first-to-invent to first-to-file. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Following M&F Worldwide, the Supreme Court issued Robert A. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Radostitz asserted that her client was entitled to the presumption of innocence, despite having made a confession, citing In Re Mohammad. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
But this decision is stayed until the Supreme Court can review it, which will be no sooner than next year at the earliest. (9) Bonus! [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are one CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
