Search for: "In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration" Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Although the Court long ago recognized that defamation claims need First Amendment safeguards because the state, through the judiciary, is making rules for speech, it is now unwilling to recognize the need for similar limits on other causes of action. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has ruled numerous times that it finds no constitutional bar to death by lethal injection. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by Matt Tait
But they’re wrong for very different reasons. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
This is evidenced through legislative enactments, court rules, and judicial codes of conduct. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Kemp, which ruled that even solid statistical evidence of racial disparities in the administration of the death penalty did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
SATZ, State Attorney for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, and JOSEPH MATTHEWS, Appellees. 4th District.Appeals -- Timeliness -- Appellant's notice of appeal failed to timely invoke court's jurisdiction to review final administrative order -- Premature -- Agency order on appellant's motion to vacate final order has not been rendered by agency and therefore the appeal from this order is premature -- Dismissal of premature… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
,(S.D.Fla.)Insurance - "Your work" exclusion in commercial general liability policy applied to claim for defective construction of home.Under Florida law, the "your work" exclusion in a commercial general liability policy issued to an insured home builder applied to a claim against the insured seeking damages resulting from the insured's alleged defective construction of a home's foundation. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
We’re not quite back in every-term-a-blockbuster mode, but October Term 2017 is looking not too shabby. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm by Dan Markel
These experts will share their thoughts and expertise on such questions as who and what the Fourth Amendment was designed to protect, how faithful the court has been to original intent, how well the Court has adapted the Amendment to modern times, and what the future may hold for the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
If an Article Five amendment were required for such a modest measure, this would set a precedent requiring similar Article Five treatment for more ambitious federal interventions – thereby condemning these measures to defeat by Southern and border states, which would predictably refuse to give them the backing needed to gain the necessary approval by three-fourths of the states.This was precisely what made Twenty-four so attractive to its leading sponsor -- the racist Senator Spessard… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Marathe predicts that in the next two to five years, deep fakes will significantly start to affect litigation and pose risks to the judicial process if key players are unprepared. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
The same is true for patriots who made constitutional arguments against the international trade embargo before and during the War of 1812, the Texas annexation, the Mexican War, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, U.S. entry into World War I and the attendant domestic repression of civil liberty, or the judicial abdication of enforcement of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments that allowed Jim Crow to flourish. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Ciavarella[17] pulls no punches: With utter disdain for the rule of law, defendants Mark A. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
"Administrative burden is relevant to how and when a judicial record may be unsealed, but not to whether it may be released at all. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm by Anna Bower
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida—and Julie Edelson. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Susan Collins’s 2020 re-election campaign, according to a search warrant application. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court, voting 5-4 along ideological lines, has ruled that strip-searches of people arrested for minor offenses does not violate the Fourth Amendment principle against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]