Search for: "In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
It also alleged that defendants routinely delayed payment of claims or denied coverage for benefits owed to the insureds.On September 18, 2007, this case was consolidated with In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation¸ Case No. 05-4182, and is pending before Judge Duval. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:13 am
Fifth Circuit in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, the Louisiana Court of Appeals is considering a lower court ruling that said a flood exclusion was ambiguous in the context of man-caused flooding as opposed to "natural" flooding. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Nationwide and In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation -- I would flat out drop my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette in amazement if the result were any different in State Farm's interlocutory appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
In rejecting this argument, the Fifth Circuit cited to the its decision in the In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, which addressed the meaning of the term “flood,” as we discussed here. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:45 am
You might have seen that, besides the decision in the big In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation last week, the Fifth Circuit decided a couple other Katrina cases on Monday.This one, Arias-Benn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:19 am
This Times-Picayune story on the Fifth Circuit's decision in In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation made no sense to me: the decision was wrong because two of the three-judge panel were appointed by Bush and all three are from Texas and therefore don't understand Louisiana law. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 2:37 pm
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled Aug. 2, 2007, in In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, No. 07-30119, that property owners in New Orleans whose buildings were flooded as a result of levee breaches in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina cannot recover losses from their insurance companies because of the flood exclusions in their insurance policies. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:09 pm
On August 2, 2007, the 5th Circuit decided In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, No 07-30119, ___F. 3d ___(5th Cir. 2007) which is a 52 page slip opinion holding that policyholders in Louisiana are not entitled to insurance coverage... [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
One more quick thought about In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation as we head into the weekend. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:14 am
Yesterday the 5th Circuit issued its 52-page opinion in In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, involving Louisiana litigants. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
About the Hurricane Deductible Endorsements in the In Re Katrina policies, the Fifth Circuit said this: [T]hey do nothing more than alter the deductible for damage caused by a hurricane. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig., No. 07-31119 (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:54 pm
Here's a pdf of the decision.District Court Judge Stanwood Duval's underlying decision had said that flood exclusions in many of the policies involved in this litigation were ambiguous because they didn't specifically define floods to include water spilling out from a canal breach, due to defective construction and human error. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
The case, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
The case, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am
The case, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation (5th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:43 am
The case, In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation (5th Cir. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:06 pm
When it was handed down late last year, the decision by federal Judge Stanwood Duval in In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation was widely greeted with amazement. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:21 am
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation, 2006 WL 3421012 (E.D. [read post]
