Search for: "In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure v."
Results 41 - 60
of 409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 9:32 am
Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:32 am
Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:20 pm
Gosh, this just sounds like a Wachovia v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:13 am
After this ruling, the lender will need to re-start foreclosure proceedings from square one. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
EMC Mortgage Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
EMC Mortgage Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
EMC Mortgage Corp. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
Most bankruptcy cases attempting to avoid foreclosure are cases involving mortgage debt, not judgment debt, so the circumstances and defenses were different in Walters v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
In Gillies v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm
” The Court also noted that foreclosure by advertisement is not a subsequent action against which res judicata may operate. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:23 am
Scott v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
(Southwest Funding), OneWest Bank, FSB (OneWest), IndyMac Mortgage Services (IndyMac), and Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
That was the case in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
As Fullerton foreclosure defense lawyers, we're disappointed by this ruling. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
First Nationwide Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 2:50 pm
” Morse v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
Class Action Complaint Adequately Pleaded Claims Against Individual Defendants Arising out of Alleged “Mortgage Foreclosure Rescue Scam” but Defendants’ Counterclaims for Fraud were Barred by Doctrine of Res Judicata Maryland Federal Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action against Metropolitan Money Store and others alleging that they were “involved in a mortgage foreclosure rescue scam”; specifically, the class… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:05 am
She loses, for reasons of collateral estoppel and res judicata. [read post]