Search for: "In Re: Mortgage Foreclosure v." Results 41 - 60 of 409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 8:13 am by Rich Vetstein
After this ruling, the lender will need to re-start foreclosure proceedings from square one. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
Most bankruptcy cases attempting to avoid foreclosure are cases involving mortgage debt, not judgment debt, so the circumstances and defenses were different in Walters v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
”  The Court also noted that foreclosure by advertisement is not a subsequent action against which res judicata may operate. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(Southwest Funding), OneWest Bank, FSB (OneWest), IndyMac Mortgage Services (IndyMac), and Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm
Class Action Complaint Adequately Pleaded Claims Against Individual Defendants Arising out of Alleged “Mortgage Foreclosure Rescue Scam” but Defendants’ Counterclaims for Fraud were Barred by Doctrine of Res Judicata Maryland Federal Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action against Metropolitan Money Store and others alleging that they were “involved in a mortgage foreclosure rescue scam”; specifically, the class… [read post]