Search for: "In Re: Order Amending Internal Operating Procedure Section 7.A of the Internal Operating Procedures of the Supreme Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
Although the Standing Orders are also currently being amended by the majority government, there is no indication that these particular provisions are being targeted, and have already been invoked prior to the anticipated changes. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Conception is a controversial term, with the result that there is no international consensus as to what it means[1]. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Conception is a controversial term, with the result that there is no international consensus as to what it means[1]. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
App.- Dallas July 7, 2011) (Opinion by Justice Mary L. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Finally, the new Treaty incorporates a series of procedural improvements to streamline and speed the extradition process. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Changes to Meet International Norms Perhaps most prominent of the changes introduced by the America Invents Act is section 3, which changed the law from first-to-invent to first-to-file. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
In March, the Supreme Court held in Lorenzo v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
First, it amended section 521(2), which is now section 521(a)(2). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Supreme Court as to federal law, but treats decisions of other circuits as persuasive precedent only. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW PRIME INC. v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
The conditions and the procedure for granting Unitary Patents are defined by an international treaty and in the hands of the European Patent Office, an international organization wider than the EU and to which the EU is not a party. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
GA Code § 17-7-54 How does the special purpose grand jury operate? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
Other EU Member State courts have shown a similar understanding not only with regard to exclusive jurisdiction agreements but also with regard to arbitration agreements (Austrian Supreme Court of Justice; High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
" The Supreme Court also agreed with the Court of Chancery that the bylaw amendment, that purported to reduce the size of the board as a means of eliminating sitting directors, was in violation of DGCL Section 109(b). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
A brief summary of the discussion of some landmark judgements delivered by the Supreme Court on the subject is given below. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
See, e.g., footnote 72 (citing a Court of Chancery Order allowing for imaging of a Blackberry in a Section 220 case.) [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Both understand that, whatever the response, these questions will be determined by lawyers, scholars, and arbitrators operating within the system of international investment law and not by actors operating outside of it. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
