Search for: "In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Ninth Circuit Public and Community Defenders et al. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:20 am
Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc et al. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Co., et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 6:56 pm
Genentech, Inc. et al. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Glaxo-SmithKline, et al., No. 06-1111, slip op. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:21 am
Regentford Ltd, of Rookwood Road, Hackney was fined £250,000 ($386,175) after being convicted of breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act et al 1974, following an eight-day trial at Croydon Crown Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:02 am
Another interesting aspect of the Ex parte Satoshi Matsubara, et al. case was the BPAI’s seemingly misplaced use of the “new use, old process” standard. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Melissa Ramirez, et. al. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
Their practices emphasize pharmaceutical patent counseling, patent procurement, and patent litigation. [2] Acorda Therapeutics Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al (Patent Docs) [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al (Patent Docs) [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:44 am
Parsley, et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:47 pm
Helm et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Cordis Corporation, et al., No. 15-998 (follow-on to SCA) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:02 am
Joseph’s Regional Medical Center case, Stephen Miller/IGF] Study: states with stronger physician protection from malpractice suits had lower usage of imaging tests [Radiology Business on Suhui Li et al., Journal of the American College of Radiology] Hospitals that require employees to take flu shots to protect patients and others may pay dearly if they’re stingy with the religious exemptions [Jon Hyman] “Maybe For-Profit Hospitals Aren’t So… [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. and Jirak et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., No. 20-1119 (secondary indicia); Sandoz Inc., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:23 am
Cynthia O’Donoghue et al. discussed this topic, and some options available to businesses , in a previous Reed Smith Client alert. [read post]
