Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (2006-3)" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
In fact, they’re aided in their Bronson-esque investigative methods by a legal system that essentially puts suspects at their mercy. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
In both negligence and strict liability, a successful cause of action requires either breach of duty (negligence) or product defect (strict liability) before the case can get to the jury. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
McNeil-PPC, Inc., 2009 WL 1178651, at *3-4 (Pa. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
”  Needless to say, most prisoner cases can’t meet that standard. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
So what of the role of the Directorate of Professional Standards in the 2006-07 investigation? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Simple assault is a disorderly persons offense unless committed in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual consent, in which case it is a petty disorderly persons offense. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
I am not satisfied that there is sufficient evidence before me at this stage to conclude that, a properly instructed jury in Hamilton, will deliver anything but a true verdict in this case [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
See 69 FR 468 (Jan. 5, 2004); 69 FR 53318 (Aug. 31, 2004); 71 FR 42605 (July 27, 2006); 73 FR 22065 (Apr. 24, 2008). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
These off-label uses or treatment regimens may be important and may even constitute a medically recognized standard of care. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The PBA questionnaires helpfully ask the candidates to mention the five most significant cases they were involved in (if they’re currently a lawyer) or that they decided (if they [read post]