Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases (No. 2005-4)"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
DHS checks biometric data on those applying for admission to the United States against government databases to identify suspected terrorists, known criminals, or individuals who have previously violated U.S. immigration laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Wilson, No. 07-2162 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a first degree murder case is reversed where the use of a non-testifying co-defendant's statement at trial, even as redacted and subject to an instruction that the jury should not use it against defendant, was an unreasonable application of Bruton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Fagans, 406 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8)… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Kentucky in concluding that petitioner had not presented a prima facie case of race discrimination with respect to jury selection at her criminal trial in state court. . [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
S. ____ (2008) (slip opinion, formatted below from .pdf to .doc format by LawPundit), which, although it is a special case of maritime law, definitely sets the logical/legal standards for treatment of punitive damages in other cases in the future.In the Exxon Valdez case, the jury had initially awarded $5 billion in punitive damages, which the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had reduced to $2.5 billion based upon due process considerations. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
McCann, No. 06-3257 Denial of a habeas corpus petition from a sentence to life imprisonment for murder is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) Apprendi principles were violated because there was no jury determination establishing the facts necessary to impose an enhanced sentence; 2) defendant never waived his right to a jury trial as to his sentence; 3) double jeopardy barred another sentencing trial so he should be re-sentenced to the maximum term of up to… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
It is the court's province to determine what law is applicable and to so instruct the jury. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
March 3, 2008 - March 7, 2008 To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:49 pm
A Benton County jury acquitted White of related charges in November 2001. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Dec. 4, 2007.] [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
THE INCOMPETENT ADMINISTRATION OFLETHAL INJECTION PROCEDURES HASRESULTED IN FORESEEABLE ANDPREVENTABLE PROBLEMS IN NUMEROUSEXECUTIONS.......................................................29CONCLUSION..........................................................36TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page(s) Brown v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
§ § 2252(a)(1) and (a)(4)(B), respectively. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 12:49 am
According to the Houston Chronicle, Washington Bureau, both The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and the 5th Circuit had been warned by The Supreme Court to follow guidelines especially in death row cases challenging jury instructions. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Rev. 531 (2005). [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
In both negligence and strict liability, a successful cause of action requires either breach of duty (negligence) or product defect (strict liability) before the case can get to the jury. [read post]
