Search for: "In Re Adoption of Cannon"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
” I agree with that too (and I suppose this means Professor Gluck is no longer urging the adoption of a “CBO Canon” to resolve this case). [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
It is not clear how much damage the reports about Hayes could do to Kitzhaber’s re-election campaign. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:35 pm
I said ‘They’re going to listen to me and they’re going to give me that money. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Those who disagree with Adler and Cannon care every bit as much about the law as they do. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, perhaps as early as next week, based on a mistaken understanding of the law, its purpose and history, propagated by Cannon and Adler and apparently adopted by one of the judges in the case. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:33 am
They're over. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:17 am
Judge Browning expressly rejects the reasoning adopted by federal judge John Gleeson, who ruled otherwise in an influential previous opinion. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
” But we’re still left with the phrase “established by a state” that is repeated in Section 1401. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:34 am
So if we’re elected, we’re not going to do it – we’re not going to change the so-called “Rand Formula”. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
In a world where we’re departing from that, we should consider congressional purposes. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856) ("The change in public opinion and feeling in relation to the African race which has taken place since the adoption of the Constitution cannot change its construction and meaning, and it must be construed and administered now according to its true meaning and intention when it was formed and adopted" Ibid., Part I ¶ 9)), or to choose a position where social norms are contested (Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 10:08 am
Your early adopter audiences are out there, they're in your communities, they're on your social channels, and they're in the associations of the industries you're going after. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
“If you don’t take the pittance they offer, they’re going to put on the boxing gloves and they’re going to batter injured victims,” plaintiffs attorney J. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Cannon 7 states all judges shall not "publicly endorse or publicly oppose another candidate for public office. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:23 pm
Next, one of my favorite health policy wonks, Cato's Mike Cannon, pens a fascinating take-down of what we call ObamneyCare©. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
As in Russell, we decline to adopt a per se rule that any dozing by defense counsel during trial merits a presumption of prejudice. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:37 am
It’s July, we’re in the middle of a record-breaking summer of heat, and the major-league baseball trade deadline is just days away. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
You're looking for humility? [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
[In re W.P., 163 N.J. 158, 168 (2000).] [read post]
