Search for: "In Re Adoption of King"
Results 41 - 60
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
Essentially, England was ruled by a despotic king (do kings come any other way?) [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
If the king accepted a petition, it would be drafted into an Act by judges of the king’s court. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 2:29 pm
It leaves a black hole in your chest when you lose family, feeling like you’re being sucked in. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
And as you’re all aware, we did revolt against Great Britain, we did form our own independent nation, and shortly thereafter we adopted the governing document for our country, the supreme law of the land, the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
The case is being heard today before Judges Carolyn Dineen King, Stuart Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:15 am
The legal industry has been slow to adopt digital marketing in favor of tried-and-true traditional marketing tactics like networking, print advertising, and radio advertising. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of Morocco and my friend King Mohammed VII — VI, I should say. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Here we go: It is therefore proposed to adopt a linear progression of IRFs. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 11:35 am
’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
The Government also argues that persons who went armed in a manner to terrify the King's subjects, as provided by the Statute of Northampton, could have their armor seized and forfeited. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
According to the Hornbook of Virginia History, Virginia also adopted the commonwealth designation until it became a royal colony again in 1660 when the English monarchy was re-established. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an Urban Institute report, Elise Colin, research assistant at the Institute, and Bryan J. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
In a recent article in the Texas Law Review, Guha Krishnamurthi, professor at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and Peter N. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
Living Res. of Contra Costa Cnty. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Fishkin criticises me for ‘never squarely discuss[ing] the fact that Reconstruction Republicans sought to re-build the regime entirely around ‘legislative power and legislative duty, not courts’. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 7:11 am
” This right was erased by King Henry VIII (the King with all the wives). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
If you’re still reading, it’s because you want to improve your processes…but until you know how you’re working right now, you can’t actually make any improvements. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:37 pm
It is at moments like that when the old tensions re-emerge and the old battles--nicely decanted in marvelously interesting vessels, re-emerge to both entertain and manage the popular perceptions, as a predicate for allowing ruling groups to act. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:26 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in the Indiana Law Journal, Marissa C. [read post]
