Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion" Results 41 - 60 of 1,460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 5:08 pm by Amy Howe
Do you want an advisory opinion, Alito asked, indicating – for example – what countries would result in Fikre’s being returned to the list if he were to visit them? [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:51 am by Legal Profession Prof
OPINION NO. 01 - 2024 RE: Propriety of a circuit court judge’s involvement in adult child’s political campaign. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On December 20, 2023, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) published a detailed consultation paper proposing major reforms to the UK listing regime with particularly significant implications for listings of equity shares in commercial companies. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
When it comes to the matter of the “free expression of opinion”, Jeff Zucker has already promised to create an editorial advisory board that would uphold the independence of the Telegraph titles and the Spectator and emphasised that he has no plans to change their management or editorial teams. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:55 pm by Rashmi Raman
Three months later, on 29 March 2023, a long debated resolution A/RES/77/276 to request an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice ‘on the obligations of states in respect of climate change’ was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am by George Croner
” The FISC reiterated this stance most recently in its April 2023 opinion when it stated (p. 73), after acknowledging the Second Circuit’s contrary opinion, that it would “respectfully adhere to the view that Fourth Amendment objectives are properly served… by examining the reasonableness of such procedures as a whole” rather than isolating the querying process for separate Fourth Amendment inquiry. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
Thus, any answer we provide would be an advisory opinion. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:30 am
., described the hearing in her opening remarks as an opportunity for leaders to "answer to and atone for the many specific instances of vitriolic, hate-filled antisemitism on your college campuses that have denied students the safe learning environment they're due. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm by Chip Merlin
So, it’s probably best to agree on someone beforehand unless you’re feeling particularly lucky or adventurous. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:08 am by Dea Sula
But if the museum does not change its policies, public opinion may go against the museum, especially in a time where there is a global push for repatriation. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:32 am
 In re Black Card LLC, 2023 USPQ2d 1376 (TTAB 2023) [precedentia] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Meadows Granted Immunity, Tells Smith He Warned Trump About 2020 Claims: Sources ABC News – Katherine Faulders, Mike Levine, and Alexander Mallin | Published: 10/24/2023 Former President Trump’s final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith’s team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath,… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm by Jacob Fishman
Before jumping on the advisory opinion bandwagon, this article poses some questions to consider. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
ACAS admitted that Mr Corby’s views were genuinely held; however, it argued that they were merely views or opinions that did not attain the necessary level of cogency and cohesiveness. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
In 1981, the South Carolina Bar’s Ethics Advisory Committee issued an opinion stating: “The position of the [husband and wife] in a divorce action are inherently adversary. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm by Futeral & Nelson, LLC
In 1981, the South Carolina Bar’s Ethics Advisory Committee issued an opinion stating: “The position of the [husband and wife] in a divorce action are inherently adversary. [read post]