Search for: "In Re Apportionment of Senate" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: 25% apportionment factor based on past license and not industry rule of thumb does not offend Uniloc: Convolve, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 10:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
It is that rule, not the Equal Protection Clause caselaw applicable to states, that governs — just as for the Senate, the textually specified rule (two senators per state) governs, even though such a non-population-based rule would be unconstitutional under the Court’s interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:13 am
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has posted the following summary of immigration-related bills that have been introduced into the House of Representatives and the Senate during the months of September and October. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP finance)   United States US General Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Identity of new USPTO Director may soon be revealed (IAM) The case against PACER: tearing down the courts’ paywall (Ars Technica)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstrief &… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc (IP Law Blog)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Clear Channel Communications – Clear Channel, Live Nation cut from business model antitrust suit (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act 2009 – Interlocutory claim construction appeals create a whole new patent backlog (Promote the Progress) Patent Reform Act 2009: more on damages (Patently-O) Patent Reform Act 2009: Rooklidge says… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:46 am
Patent reform 2007 was about apportionment of damages, period. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:05 am
IPBiz came across this text at pocketpcthoughts:"Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
" When Senator Specter pulled the plug on "apportionment of damages" (as understood by the Coalition for Patent Fairness), the "reformers" went home. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:48 am
Hewlett Packard's GC Mike Holston, who spoke with Reuters recently about the meeting, commented that "we're 95 percent of the way there . . . we're in the final stretch. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:21 pm
It should be self-evident that "those accused of infringement" can initiate patent re-examination proceedings, and, in fact, many accused of infringement HAVE INITIATED re-examination proceedings. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:11 pm
Senate Committee on the Judiciary addressing the concerns of emerging companies. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 8:41 pm
"There is massive and widespread opposition to the bill, and if the Senate thinks they're going to just roll it through, I think that's a mistake," he said. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:51 pm
The Senate bill still has the second window and, according to some, a very low threshold for challenges. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:45 pm
Earlier: DOJ: US Needs More Prior User Rights Patent Reform Letter: The Re-Mix Senate Judiciary Republican Letter on Patent Reform [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 12:07 pm
Re-stating concerns with the patent bill, the group urged: Removal of language pertaining to the apportionment of damages; Removal of the open-ended post-grant review process; Removal of rulemaking authority for the Patent and Trademark Office; and The inclusion of a more flexible grace period. [read post]