Search for: "In Re Bose Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:54 am
Cobra Electronics Corporation, Opposition No. 91162506 [Opposition to registration of the mark COBRA.for vehicle alarm systems on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with Opposer's snake-branded vehicle security, vehicle remote start, and vehicle tracking products].November 12, 2009 - 10 AM: Bose Corporation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:49 am
"In its decision of August 31, 2009 in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New USPTO procedures likely to delay action in requests for continued examination of patent applications (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) 12 Republican Senators send letter to Senate Majority Leader re concerns about post-grant review provisions in S.515 (Inventive Step) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Questions on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New USPTO procedures likely to delay action in requests for continued examination of patent applications (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) 12 Republican Senators send letter to Senate Majority Leader re concerns about post-grant review provisions in S.515 (Inventive Step) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Questions on acquiescence… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New USPTO procedures likely to delay action in requests for continued examination of patent applications (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) 12 Republican Senators send letter to Senate Majority Leader re concerns about post-grant review provisions in S.515 (Inventive Step) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Questions on acquiescence… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 2:26 am
My current thinking is set out below, admittedly based on limited information.Fraud in the post-Bose eraThe CAFC's decision in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
The Board applied the CAFC's fraud standard set out in In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:28 am
In re Bose Corporation, 2008-1448 at 6. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
In re Bose Corp., __ F.3d __, __ USPQ2d __ (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:36 pm
Of course, the catalyst for the webinar is the CAFC's recent decision in In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Microsoft indemnifies its big corporate customers, and so stepped in. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
” See In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448, slip op. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
See In Re Bose Corporation. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark… [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:32 pm
See In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm
This ruling, issued in In re Bose Corporation, Opposition No. 91/157,315, 2009 WL 2709312 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Bose Corporation, 91 USPQ2d 1938 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:24 pm
By 1997, Bose Corporation quit making tape recorders and players. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
