Search for: "In Re Ctm"
Results 41 - 60
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
Trademark vs branding – Sci Fi Channel will now be called Syfy (China Hearsay) Europe CFI: Mars loses CTM right in 3D shape for chocolate snacks: Mars v OHIM, Ludwig Schokolade (Class 46) (The IP Factor) CFI: James Bond fails again to defeat DR. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Not everyone agrees withthe media on IP mattersThose Kit Kat chocolate biscuit fingers positively refuse to lie down: here they are again, in all their glory. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
No relation ...The facts of the case in brief are that the claimant owns a UK registration for SUPREME as a word mark, and various other UK and CTM registrations for SUPREME with design elements. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The national court must now assess whether the cumulative conditions are fulfilled for that defence to arise.The decision also highlighted the complex interplay between the jurisdictional rules of the Design Regulation and the re-cast Brussels Regulation (1215/2012). [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
It leaves open the option for Cadbury to re-file with a different description. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:38 am
By consistently benchmarking innovation with concrete metrics on global patent and scientific literature production, we’re able to get a clear outlook on future growth areas. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
How swiftly time flies when you're up to your whiskers in intellectual property! [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
It is time that those responsible for the proposed changes to the CTM Regulation and the Harmonisation Directive to make the only sensible decision, which is to maintain the existing name. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(IP finance) An IP strategist’s economic forecast for 2010: an outsider’s view and how one can outperform the ‘experts’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Australia Advisory Council on Intellectual Property proposes setting up IP dispute resolution centre to deal with patent disputes (Managing Intellectual Property) Brazil IP infringement and capacity to sue in Brazil (IP tango) WTO rules in favour of Brazil, allows for cross retaliation against… [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:10 am
Several of his clients have noted that they have many of the prevention plan elements in place, but they’re just not put together in one document. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 50: TTAB says consent and license from registrant require reversal of 2(d) refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for Machinery – In re Wacker Neuson SE (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 1: TTAB affirms 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of motorcycle stand design: In re Charles N. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Cir. 2011) (en banc): The dissenting opinion (Patent Docs) CAFC finds re-examined claims of U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:36 am
Clients expect you to be able to advise more widely, not only on logos and international issues if they’re selling worldwide via an ecommerce site, but also in a number of other ways, such as when they’re choosing keywords or domain names. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI clarifies… [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
The contested decision was therefore partially annulled, leaving it for the Board of Appeal to re-examine the arguments on the existence of a risk of an unfair advantage being taken within the meaning of Article 8(5).This Kat thinks the General Court's summary and guidance were good and provide quite a handy checklist both for prospective rights owners who want to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of Community collective marks and protected geographical indications and for… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
(Trademark Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns State anti-counterfeiting law: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Omar (IP Spotlight Precedential no. 39: TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of VOLTA for caffeine-laced vodka: In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc (TTABlog) Test your TTAB eye-ball ability on two triangle design marks for clothing: L.A. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
It looks like we're stuck with something which looks rather like a tort of unfair competition. [read post]
