Search for: "In Re Ctm"
Results 41 - 60
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
Indeed this starts to look like a post-hearing attempt by the Court to answer a question it was not asked:: “[3A] Assuming the application of 4/03 is not correct in EU law, how must we construe all existing (CTM?) [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:36 pm
One, Two, Three Stripes & you’re sued! [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:20 am
Language of moral outrage—they’re using my name/identity theft. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Our CTM was held up in a very long dispute in the EC, so we couldn’t rely on TM rights when they copied Ben 10; copyright was our saving grace. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
Where a CTM is invoked for the purposes of opposing the registration of a national trade mark, if the date of filing of the application for that CTM were to be established by taking account of provisions of national law, that would in effect undermine the uniform nature of the protection of a CTM because the Member States remain free to determine the procedure for filing applications for national trade marks, with the result that the extent of the protection… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Cluttering of register/genuine use of CTMs as problems of convergence? [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(Patents Post-Grant) AUTM survey shows significant increases in university patent filings and issuances in FY2010 (Patent Docs) Pending Supreme Court and en banc Federal Circuit patent cases (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions Shift in grounds of USPTO reexamination rejection examined by CAFC: In re Stepan Company (Patents Post-Grant) (IPBiz) CAFC tackles “consisting of” in In re Taylor (IPBiz) Federal Circuit affirms limits on using litigation expenses to… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
The only other party apart from OHIM is the CTM applicant, and you can't expect the applicant to carry out this task]. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
In re Bird Brain (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are PARK LANE and PARK AVENUE confusingly similar for footwear? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Just an Examiner) Clean tech in court: Green patent complaint update (Green Patent Blog) Guest post: Mark Twain’s patent interference (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC on BPAI in In re Leithem: “This conclusory analysis is hardly persuasive (IPBiz) CAFC finds construction of term unnecessary: Respironics v Invacare (nonprecedential) (GRAY on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking statute is constitutional: Luka v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IP Dragon) China, IP enforcement, trade fairs and trade marks (IPKat) Ecuador A spicy note for Gandhi’s case – Gandhi trade mark opposition filed in Ecuador (IP tango) (Spicy IP) Europe G 2/10 – EPO EBoA decides on disclaimers for disclosed embodiments (EPLAW) (IPKat) (Kluwer Patent Blog) J 25/10 – EPO Legal Board of Appeal: Refund of the examination fee after withdrawal of the application, restrictive practice of the EPO overruled (EPLAW) G1/11: an new… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:09 pm
However it is re-usable under the UK's Open Government Licence. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe CJEU – Exceptions to public lending rights and authors’ remuneration: Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auters (Vewa) v Belgium (JIPLP) EPO BoA: Claim excluded from patentability under article 53 EPC as method of treatment: T1680/08 determining airway pressure levels (Kluwer Patent Blog) EPO BoA refuses to find set of claims filed with grounds of appeal admissible, because of earlier refusal to file these claims during first instance… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe CJEU – Exceptions to public lending rights and authors’ remuneration: Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auters (Vewa) v Belgium (JIPLP) EPO BoA: Claim excluded from patentability under article 53 EPC as method of treatment: T1680/08 determining airway pressure levels (Kluwer Patent Blog) EPO BoA refuses to find set of claims filed with grounds of appeal admissible, because of earlier refusal to file these claims during first instance… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) CAFC: Analogous art test as the new structure for non-obviousness determinations: In re Klein (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) CAFC vacates preliminary injunction where District Court applied incorrect claim construction: Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Cir. 2011) (en banc): The dissenting opinion (Patent Docs) CAFC finds re-examined claims of U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 9: Finding wine and beer related, TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of HB over HB & Crown Design: In re Kysela Pere et Fils, Ltd. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:38 pm
” [Merpel speculates that this will result in more marks sailing through to registration and more troubles once they're granted ...] [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
jovický Budvar (IPKat) (Class 46) Did you ‘Meister’ the subtle art of CTM comparison? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:46 pm
If so, you're not alone. [read post]
