Search for: "In Re Eec" Results 41 - 57 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2010, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As long ago as 1974 the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted a Resolution on the Right of Reply (Res (74) 26). [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Prior to the Act, the United Kingdom had failed to implement Equal Treatment Directive 79/7/EEC to ensure that any national laws, contrary to the principle of equal treatment, were abolished. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:29 pm by Nathan
Well, we’re very interested to see what the delegates announce tomorrow. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:30 am by INFORRM
As long ago as 1974 the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted a Resolution on the Right of Reply (Res (74) 26). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Eric
Article 5(1)(a) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks and Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising, on the basis of a keyword identical with that trade mark which that advertiser has, without the consent of the proprietor,… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm by WIMS
The Agency has requested that the Environmental Engineering Committee (EEC) of the SAB evaluate and provide advice on EPA's proposed approach. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:29 am by Veronika Gaertner
Recently, the March/April issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (IPRax) was published. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
 (IPKat commentary here), Matsushita Electric (sadly not freely available online, but with IPKat commentary here), Re Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92  (aka Gilead Sciences, commented on the SPC blog here), and the recent (but far from final) chapter in the saga of Zipher v Markem  (IPKat commentary here).All of these cases are essential reading for those wishing to be kept up to date with patent-related matters in the UK. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
High Court (Family Division) Z County Council v TS & Ors [2008] EWHC 1773 (Fam) (25 July 2008) SW v SW & Anor [2008] EWHC 1890 (Fam) (31 July 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Re Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 [2008] EWHC 1902 (Pat) (31 July 2008) Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat) (31 July 2008) Source: www.bailii.org. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:30 pm
To codify and thereby to re-title these provisions will thus have a very notable legal and practical impact. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 9:41 am
Before paying the high price of de-legalisation, Europe should try out the alternative of re-conceptualising European law as new type of conflict of laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:48 pm
This obligation had never been put into practice except in cases of total repackaging with re-application of the trade mark. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:01 pm
À la lumière des observations qui précèdent, je suggère à la Cour de répondre aux questions préjudicielles formulées par l'Oberster Patent- und Markensenat, comme suit: «1) L'expression… [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:46 am
Who has not been infuriated by the previous need to make mention of"Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 concerning misleading and comparative advertising, as amended by Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997"? [read post]