Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doe)"
Results 41 - 46
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Subpoena Duces Tecum Served on the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 145 F.3d 1422, 1424-25 & n.2 (D.C.Cir. 1998)(“[i]f the plaintiff’s cause of action is directed at the government’s intent, however, it makes no sense to permit the government to use the [deliberative process] privilege as a shield”). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
It does not mean a fanciful or capricious doubt, nor does it mean beyond all possibility of doubt. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
The court begins the opinion by explaining that[a]fter a nine-day trial, a jury found Dontavious Blake and Tara Jo Moore guilty of child sex trafficking for managing a prostitution ring involving at least two girls under the age of eighteen. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Good Faith A finding that the Warrant was invalid does not end the inquiry. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In a jury-research project we once conducted, a very nice older lady at one point threw up her hands and said: “I just want to know if he did it. [read post]
