Search for: "In Re Grynberg"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Dr Roman Grynberg, a Pacific authority on trade, says the reason is simple – many Pacific Islanders are poor “and these foods are cheap”. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
Appellee re-stated the issuesand asked the Court to award it attorney fees and costs in defending thisappeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Grynberg: doesn’t understand the assumption that registrants generally want to push the envelope. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
Grynberg: how do consumers of these products feel? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
We’re not depriving the public of something useful. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Is confusion what we’re testing for in those cases anyway? [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Michael Grynberg Confusion is the boundary limit of the TM right. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
They’re much more uncomfortable with having fun. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Mark Lemley: Now he’s profoundly depressed, because if Grynberg’s descriptive claim is right, we’re screwed. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Barrett thinks we’re unlikely to see more defenses created by the courts. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:14 am
Grynberg v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 9:28 am
As promised, you are welcome to read these Not Ready for Prime Time CAFA cases: Grynberg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
If they're leaving the market or making substantial changes in the product, trademark owners can use the marks to deceive consumers, at least for a period of time. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:48 am
Grynberg v. [read post]
