Search for: "In Re Harbor Financial Group, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Here is how the Illinois Appellate court characterized the defendants’ appeal:  “In essence, what defendants are arguing on this appeal and at this early stage of the litigation is that they should be able to market a drug, even assuming that they know it is dangerous and useless, until the FDA officially stops them, and then bear no financial responsibility for the consequences. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:19 am by Lovechilde
And we're not just talking about relatively genteel crimes like financial fraud. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  These provisions allow the entity to use and disclose information that neither identifies nor provides a reasonable basis to identify an individual provided the Covered Entity can show that the PHI has been de-identified in accordance with either the Expert Determination Method or the Safe Harbor Method of the de-identification standard of the Privacy Rule and is not re-identified. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
If an employer misses the relevant contractual deadline to release an employee from her/his non-compete, the financial compensation will be due for the entire period. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
After attending the PLUS D&O Symposium  some years ago, several colleagues at Partner Re thought it might be worthwhile to provide D&O insurance professionals with historical overview of the evolution of Directors and Officers insurance (D&O) in the US marketplace. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
Doctors generally don't tell people that they're prescribing drugs pitched to them by pharmaceutical salespeople for unapproved treatments, says Peter Lurie, deputy medical director of Public Citizen, a Washington-based public interest group. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed further below, the FTC has brought such an enforcement action against the Wyndham hotel group, a case pending at the Third Circuit which is expected to address the reach of the FTC’s authority in this area. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:28 am by Terry Hart
Safe Harbor and Beyond The white paper finally argues that Megaupload should not be liable for the massive infringement it caused and contributed to because it is eligible for safe harbor under the DMCA. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
District Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District Court of New York issued an injunction against Telegram Group Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am by John Delaney and Aaron Rubin
The hotly-debated EU e-Privacy Regulation, when finalized, also will require companies to re-evaluate their practices for cookies, direct marketing, and other online marketing practices. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
San Francisco Nov. 16, 2020), and In re Dropbox, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
FTI Consulting, Inc., 16-784, granted last Monday. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Rule 506 safe harbor provides insulation from state blue sky laws and, as I’ve mentioned, from the registration provisions of the federal securities laws. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]