Search for: "In Re Harbour"
Results 41 - 60
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
Written by María Barral Martínez, a former trainee at the European Court of Justice (Chambers of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona) and an alumna of the University of Amsterdam and the University of Santiago de Compostela The Hoge Raad Neederlanden (The Dutch Supreme Court), the referring court in the case Supreme Site Service and Others, C-186/19, harbours doubts regarding the international jurisdiction of Dutch courts under the Brussels I bis Regulation, in respect to a… [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:27 am
That content is then transcoded and re-streamed in real time to any other user who searches for and selects the stream (the user-DJ’s account is set as public). [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:06 pm
So, we’re currently in the second quarter. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 2:23 am
While the case is still ongoing, the blog analyses whether a platform, built on the user-generated content model, can avail itself of the “safe harbour” exception under the Indian IT Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
That case, as readers may remember, concerns whether YouTube (1) does directly perform copyright-restricted acts (acts of communication to the public under Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive) when it gives access to user-uploaded content and (2) can rely on the hosting safe harbour under the e-Commerce Directive. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
As we enter a new decade, the re-elected liberal federal government will be working with Canadians to attain the thirteen (13) sustainable development goals by 2022. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Other works included Kahil Gibran’s "The Prophet", Virginia Woolf’s "Jacob’s Room", Agatha Christie’s "The Murder on the Links", Marcel Proust’s "The Prisoner" (La Prisonnière, vol. 5 of In Search of Lost Time), William Carlos Williams’s "The Great American Novel", H. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
Justice Birss says that: - TuneIn is “targeting” UK users and is liable for communication;- Individual users who use the “record” function are liable for copying;- Providers of stations other than those licensed in UK are liable;- TuneIn is liable for “authorisation” (somewhat… [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:57 pm
In 1930, in Re Prince Blücher, it invalidated delegation of signing to a solicitor. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
The presence of The Harbour Dredging Scandal during this period, also known as Harbourgate, was one of the main political impetus for these debates. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:45 pm
The NAIC Model reflects the NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation, and offers states a common approach The NAIC’s Model Law is intended to apply to any individual or nongovernmental entity that is licensed, authorised, or registered under insurance laws, as well as industry service providers (licensees). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
” (para. 70) Referring back to Re Manitoba Language Rights Reference, the Court identified three elements of the rule of law: “the rule of law provides that the law is supreme over the acts of both government and private persons” (one law for all); a system of “positive laws” that “’embodies the more general principle of normative order'”; and “the relationship between the state and the individual must be regulated by law”… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:12 am
‘Safe Harbours’ must not become archipelagos for platforms to devalue music. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
When does a provider lose the safe harbour? [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In other words, a “party will not be permitted to assume a contrary position in another proceeding simply because the party’s interests have changed” (Green Harbour Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ermiger, 128 AD3d 1142, 1144 [3d Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
Even when a particular conflict opposing specific individuals or groups of interests could be settled, the broader underlying conflicts of interest would subsist and re-emerge. [read post]
