Search for: "In Re Interest of Walter W." Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
These conversations are important, and they’re endlessly fascinating theoretically. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:29 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Heroy, 895 NE 2d 1025 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 3rd Div. 2008 “[W]hen one spouse makes a greater contribution to the marital assets, the court may be justified in awarding him or her a larger share of the marital property. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
  If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Walter Olson addresses this question in this article in today's Wall Street Journal. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 2:28 pm by Vishnu Kannan
And is he making those decisions on the best interest of the American people, of you, or self interest. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:19 pm by Kelly Buchanan
W., North Atlantic Ocean, Whereby Loss of Life Ensued; Presented to Both Houses of Parliament by Command of His Majesty, and Evidence Appendices. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, “[w]e have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest,” and “[o]ur clients’ interests always come first. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
“[W]ith respect to the argument of State necessity,” he said, “the common law does not understand that kind of reasoning”. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Walter Shaub, former director of the Office of Government Ethics, said such an action would need to follow complex rules and be approved by the ethics office. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Walters, 309 F.3d 629 (9th Cir. 2002), struck down a federal policy which threatened doctors with revocation of their DEA prescription authority if they recommended the medicinal use of marijuana to their patients. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) Fast tracking inter partes patent re-examination by agreement (Patents Post Grant Blog) Fixing indirect infringement problems in patent reexamination? [read post]