Search for: "In Re Interstate Power Co."
Results 41 - 60
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 1:24 pm
We’re back with another round of discussion and debate featuring co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney, working through the latest national security law developments. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 Tuesday in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
American Express Co., 585 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA does not contest that its restraints affect interstate trade and commerce and are thus subject to the Sherman Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
After donating to the NRCC, donors are shown a yellow box with a small pre-checked box that warns: “If you UNCHECK this box, we will have to tell Trump you’re a DEFECTOR. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court granted certification on February 3 to review the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s decision in In re PennEast Pipeline Co. in order to resolve an important question: Does the Natural Gas Act (NGA) delegate authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest when FERC grants a certificate of public convenience and necessity for an interstate pipeline… [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Gannett Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
I promised quite a while ago to say more about Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
Lord Acton (1834-1902), the English historian, famously said that “power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
While a substantial and complex body of case law has developed under RICO, the following are the main issues that bear on the viability of such a claim against the lawyers and medical professionals who are responsible for allegedly bogus claims, such as were seen in the Silica MDL: The existence of repeated instances of the misconduct on which the RICO claim is predicated; A showing that there has been a pattern or practice of such misconduct; Proof that a person has conducted the affairs of an… [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
