Search for: "In Re Kp"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2022, 11:49 am
With the interim order, the Supreme Court blocked Rana from re-entering the court. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
We’re not in that world any more. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
KP-0123 (case citations omitted): In August of 2016, the ABA House of Delegates amended Model Rule 8.4 to add subsection (g), which provides that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (g) engage in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is harassment or discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status or socioeconomic status in conduct related to the practice of law.… [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 3:32 am
Because I think anyone that has ever served on a jury knows that that those jury instructions feel pretty darn binding when you’re making your decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 2:51 pm
" Kasarda then presents the following question: "If [Armory is] suing about the supposed property rights of the CAV Arms slash now GWACS Mark II lower in relation to the completely new designed KP-15 … what is it they're trying to acquire if it isn't to manufacture more or a new monolithic polymer lower if the person investing in them flat out says that he is against AR-15s and military-style firearms in the civilian hands? [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:19 pm
If it goes to moderation because, for example, you’re new here, the time stamp on your comment is what counts. [read post]
5 May 2022, 7:00 pm
If you or a family member became ill with a Salmonella infection, including Reactive Arthritis or Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), after consuming food and you’re interested in pursuing a legal claim, contact the Marler Clark Salmonella attorneys for a free case evaluation. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(Chicago IP Litigation) US Trademarks TTAB issued 50 precedential decisions in 2010 (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Decisions SCOTUS: Likelihood of confusion bows to fair use: KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:18 pm
* For the KP Permanent Markup case, I've not had any luck buying the original items at issue. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Barrett thinks we’re unlikely to see more defenses created by the courts. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
International Courts & Tribunals at a Glance, a juscogens.net feature, aims to provide timely notice of recent happenings and trial developments in an organized, central location and an unbiased, objective manner. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
They’re much more uncomfortable with having fun. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
But if so, we’re in trouble. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
That leads directly to KP Permanent. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:11 am
Konu ile ilgili mevzuatta açık hükümler bulunmaktadır.1. 5490 sayılı Nüfus Hizmetleri Kanunu'nun SO'nci maddesine göre adres bildirimlerini kayda geçirmekten nüfus müdürlükleri, sorumlu tutulmuştur. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Look how they’re defined in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Is confusion what we’re testing for in those cases anyway? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
Courts go out of their way to characterize speech as commercial when they're going to find for the plaintiff.Without Central Hudson, all this is cast into doubt. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If we’re going to engage with boundaries, we should also engage with the instincts courts have about copying. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
I’m not sure how faithful the court’s ruling is to the KP Permanent Makeup decision, which said that descriptive fair use can apply even if there is consumer confusion. [read post]
