Search for: "In Re LG"
Results 41 - 60
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in In re Samsung today granted Samsung’s and LG’s writs of mandamus, which sought to order the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas to transfer the underlying actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in In re Samsung today granted Samsung’s and LG’s writs of mandamus, which sought to order the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas to transfer the underlying actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 May 2021, 12:33 pm
We’re optimistic the Federal Circuit will grant those petitions. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:41 am
LG München I GRUR-RS 2020, 22577; 21 O 13026/19 bei juris) angesehen werden. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am
"LG Electronics"LG has regular and established places of businesses in this District, including at 9420 Research Blvd, Austin, Texas 78759. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am
” In one of its most recent cases, it recognized that “we’re in a post-Phoebe Putney world” that sets a far higher bar for clear articulation. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
Resources Legal Cases Bobbs-Merrill Co. v Straus (Historic Case Re First-Sale Doctrine) UMG v Augusto (EFF Victory re First Sale and License Conditions) When is a ‘License’ Really a Sale? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
In re LG Electronics Inc., Serial No. 88055289 (August 26, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).Trademark Rule 2.41(a) provides that an applicant’s “ownership of one or more active prior registrations on the Principal Register . . . of the same mark may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness if the goods or services are sufficiently similar to the goods and services in the application. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
., 2020 WL 4937464, No. 17 Civ. 614 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am
” In re Musical Instruments & Equip. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:40 am
Key Findings Sixteen states will hold a sales tax holiday in 2020, down from a peak of 19 in 2010 but unchanged from last year. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
“We compete with a wide variety of companies, Google, Samsung, Huawei, Vivo, LG, Lenovo and many more,” Daniel Matray, head of Apple’s App Store and Apple Media Services, told a Forum Europe online event. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:22 am
Patent No. 7,869,396 on a "data transmission method and data re-transmission method" (a former LG patent declared essential to 4G/LTE and temporarily assigned to Thomson)U.S. [read post]
China Patent: SPC IP Tribunal holds first joint hearing on patent validity and infringement disputes
24 Dec 2019, 5:49 am
In response, LG Electronics initiated an invalidation action before the Patent Re-examination Board (PRB), challenging the validity of the ’855 Patent. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
Korea--with Samsung and LG being based there--is a strategically important market. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 10:41 am
Apple settled during opening statements at the April 2019 trial in San Diego--as did Korea's LG Electronics a few months later. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:41 pm
via americanaffairsjournal.org H/t LGS. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 9:43 am
What lends this particular importance is that it shows it's about product-focused innovators (car makers, TCU makers, and the likes of Huawei, Samsung, and LG) versus companies like Nokia and Ericsson, whose current product business is a shadow of its former self, so they increasingly focus on patent monetization.Something I had heard through the grapevine was finally confirmed today:Huawei has recently filed an antitrust complaint against Nokia with the Dusseldorf Regional Court,… [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
We're not even talking about the Supreme Court deciding to overrule an earlier decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
