Search for: "In Re Lindsay"
Results 41 - 60
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 5:08 am
We’re so happy to have you with us this week. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:46 am
Lindsay: Hi. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 10:25 am
Lindsay: Great. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 10:31 am
Courtesy of Lindsay Flathers Photography (lindsayflathers.com)If you’re the owner of one of the almost 12 million registered boats in the United States, ahoy! [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 5:30 am
They’re happier there. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 3:40 am
Today we’re stepping up to that challenge with a bipartisan bill to treat Big Tech the way we treat other industries. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:40 am
Lindsay: Wow. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
Lindsay: We’re not clear on that either. [read post]
14 May 2023, 3:10 pm
ChatGPT:You're right! [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:05 am
They’re all lying, Trump’s defenders would claim. [read post]
9 May 2023, 3:58 am
We’re not engaging in those kinds of things; it legitimizes ICE’s violence, it makes Northwestern complicit in this. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
So we’re being recorded, Diego, so we’re right now in an interview, and Lindsay wanted to ask you a couple of questions. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:49 pm
“Woooo, Lindsay. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
” What’s interesting even if you’re not generally following the ins & outs of crypto is that in its 50-page (!) [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:28 am
Lindsay: Great. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:53 pm
Pal, we’re so happy to have you back. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 2:38 pm
Taras Utiralov: Hi, Lindsay. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
March 27, 2023 - 11 AM [In-person]: In re Lindsay Hoopes, Serial Nos. 90498749 and 90498755 [Section 2(d) refusals to register NAPANAC for "Brandy; Fortified wines; Spirits" in view of the registered certification mark NAPA GREEN for wine derived from grapes grown in Napa Valley, California, and for promoting sustainable winery practices in Napa Valley, and in view of the registered mark NAPA VALLEY for wine.] [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 10:37 am
Lindsay: Yes, and we’re happy for you. [read post]
