Search for: "In Re Marriage of Baker"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2018, 8:47 am
"[12] Inter-racial or inter-religious marriages, for example, are seen by many as one outgrowth of inclusivity and tolerance. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:21 am
"[12] Inter-racial or inter-religious marriages, for example, are seen by many as one outgrowth of inclusivity and tolerance. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:42 pm
How could the lowly baker be protected where Michelangelo is not?! [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
Would Phillips’ baking a cake make him complicit in supporting gay marriage, or would it just make him a baker? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
Here is a jurisprudential penumbra zone.In the US, the Supreme Court will soon decide whether requiring a baker to design and make a cake that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about same-sex marriage violates the Free Speech or Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm
Baker (1840), 3 Moo. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
” And in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky weighs in on Ayestas, arguing that “[n]o one should face execution because they’re too poor to put on a defense. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court will soon consider whether a Colorado law compelling a baker to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex marriage violates his First Amendment rights. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
New York (17 Apr 1905) ―Lochner, a baker from New York, was convicted of violating the New York Bakeshop Act, which prohibited bakers from working more than 10 hours a day and 60 hours a week. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
The religion-versus-marriage equality fight will be staged when the Supreme Court re-convenes in October 2017.A second set of developments relate to marriages rather than weddings. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am
Then again, if you need a wedding cake and one baker turns you away, go to another baker. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:35 am
That’s no way to protect and defend the Constitution, and we’re doomed to fall off the stool. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:19 am
You’re baking a friggin’ cake. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:29 pm
We’re awaiting confirmation no objection is taken to publication of responses and hope [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 pm
In In re Marriage of Enders and Baker, 2015 Ill. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
When dissenting judges say that lower-court majorities haven’t followed Supreme Court precedent, they’re throwing shade. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am
”SCOV writes a nice concise summary of the last 15 years going from Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
In 2011, the Obama administration announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 1:00 pm
The Baker defendants’ pitch is that the trial court’s enlargement of time expired before the Baker defendants were served. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of The Burger Court & the Rise of the Judicial Right (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 450), by Michael J. [read post]
